Happy Saturday. I miss watching Saturday morning shows when I was a kid. Don't you all feel the same way?

Donate to the American Heart Association link to reach $20,000 for the First Place ranking! Every dollar counts💵

Congratulations! We have reached 301 pages!!!

What if the Fake Tragic character is redeemed or is sympathetic otherwise?

Random question that popped in my mind, but which Shonen Heroes you guys think have the most noble goal overall? And what about the least noble?

Since most Shonen Heroes have personalities resembling that of young boys, I added a new Basic Trait.

• Youthful: A Shonen Hero has a personality that resembles that of a kid/teenager.

Since there are 13 Archetype Wikis and only two admins thus far, we need creative minds to help us to not only keep the wikis going, but to help gain a wider audience. We need at least 4 admins to assist us.

Here are the conditions:

1. An admin must have creative and professional writing skills.

2. An admin must be organized with the articles and the proposals.

Shinji is obviously a no-go here (in fact, I think he may even fit the ASP), Asuka doesn't meet enough of the basic traits IMO, Rei is pretty much her own archetype and Kaworu and Mari are more similar to a light novel hero and a shojo hero respectively to me. However, I'm still not sure entirely if the entire series should go under the drain or not.

Aside from the Archetype Wikis, I got ideas for Trope Wikis. Here are the ones I have in mind:

• Sonic Expies

• Homer Simpson Expies

• Bart Simpson Expies

• Mickey Mouse Expies

@ACisNet999 @Gibraltarr What are your opinions?

So recently, I feel like the votes for candidates are fairly lackluster. For the most part, they're generally one sentence to upvote or downvote candidates. While this doesn't seem to be an issue when talking about most traditional candidates, we are starting to run into an actual problem when talking about more complex cases. For example, someone unfamiliar with the criteria might upvote an obvious non-qualifer by saying "Yes to [Candidate X] for doing [Action Y]". In order to stop these types of situations from happening, I've decided to require votes to be relatively detailed enough to show that voters actually understand the criteria. For example, instead of just talking about their actions, it is encouraged for Voters to address the actual personality of candidates from now on. While actions are important for a character to count, personality is another important aspect for these archetypes. Any vote that is deemed lackluster will be registered as Invalid if not properly expanded.